Taiwan
Regular Season Round 17: Pauian - Jutai Techn. 100-89
Date: April 1, 2021
Bottom-ranked Pauian managed to get the third consecutive victory. This time they won against fourth-ranked Jutai Techn. 100-89. Pauian dominated down low during the game scoring 74 of its points in the paint compared to Jutai Techn.'s 44. They outrebounded Jutai Techn. 45-31 including a 31-19 advantage in defensive rebounds. Pauian players were unselfish on offense dishing 27 assists. The best player for the winners was center Dan Qiao (200-92) who had a double-double by scoring 28 points, 18 rebounds and 9 assists. Power forward Yen-Tsung Shih (194-92) chipped in a double-double by scoring 16 points and 10 rebounds. Four Pauian players scored in double figures. American swingman Jordan Caroline (201-96, college: Nevada) produced a double-double by scoring 23 points and 12 rebounds and guard Chun-An Yu (190-92) added 21 points respectively for Pauian. Both coaches allowed to play bench players saving starting five for next games. Pauian have a solid series of three victories in a row. They maintain fifth place with 8-24 record. Jutai Techn. lost fourth consecutive game. They keep the fourth position with 21 games lost. Pauian's next round opponent will be higher ranked Bank of Taiwan (#3) and it will be quite challenging to get another victory. Jutai Techn. will play against the league's second-placed Yulon Luxgen and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 17: Pauian - Jutai Techn. 100-89
Date: April 1, 2021
Bottom-ranked Pauian managed to get the third consecutive victory. This time they won against fourth-ranked Jutai Techn. 100-89. Pauian dominated down low during the game scoring 74 of its points in the paint compared to Jutai Techn.'s 44. They outrebounded Jutai Techn. 45-31 including a 31-19 advantage in defensive rebounds. Pauian players were unselfish on offense dishing 27 assists. The best player for the winners was center Dan Qiao (200-92) who had a double-double by scoring 28 points, 18 rebounds and 9 assists. Power forward Yen-Tsung Shih (194-92) chipped in a double-double by scoring 16 points and 10 rebounds. Four Pauian players scored in double figures. American swingman Jordan Caroline (201-96, college: Nevada) produced a double-double by scoring 23 points and 12 rebounds and guard Chun-An Yu (190-92) added 21 points respectively for Pauian. Both coaches allowed to play bench players saving starting five for next games. Pauian have a solid series of three victories in a row. They maintain fifth place with 8-24 record. Jutai Techn. lost fourth consecutive game. They keep the fourth position with 21 games lost. Pauian's next round opponent will be higher ranked Bank of Taiwan (#3) and it will be quite challenging to get another victory. Jutai Techn. will play against the league's second-placed Yulon Luxgen and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
 JUTAI TECHN.78 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 83 | CiQIlajR, zIQdij | 48 | 9-68 (02.4%) | 5-4 (5%) | 7-63 (13.4%) | 1 | 1 | 68 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 84 | 85 | 5 |
| 68 | vaj, eRj-HIjD | 84 | 6-0 (85%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 9 | Yu, Huij-Yi | 69 | 8-0 (35%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 5 |
| 3 | va, Hij-HhRjD | 60 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 09 | Wu, NaiI-zaj | 68 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 9 | 5 |
| 61 | Wu, HIjD-NajD | 66 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 5 |
| 62 | Wu, Ya-maj | 9 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-4 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| 2 | ChRj, WRj-HuijD | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 84 | vaj, mia-HiI | 1 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 40 | Yu, Chuj-Sj | 3 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 4-0 (15%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 86 | 60 | 5 |
| 36 | Au, Ya-Chaj | 3 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 89 | KR, baj-HiI | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 88-39 (31.2%) | 9-89 (80.7%) | 64-85 (10.5%) | 68 | 67 | 46 | 60 | 69 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 68 | 92 | 09 | |||
 PAUIAN100 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 6 | raiI, gij | 48 | 64-62 (98.8%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 1 | 68 | 62 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 82 | 31 | 5 |
| 7 | vaj, zaj-mijD | 48 | 9-2 (29.0%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 69 | 85 | 5 |
| 9 | Ahah, YRj-wsujD | 48 | 3-2 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 3 | 1 | 65 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 61 | 85 | 5 |
| 4 | Wu, Chai-Chuj | 45 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| 17 | Chuj-HsaijD vu | 67 | 3-3 (655%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 66 | 66 | 5 |
| 68 | va, zai-KijD | 69 | 4-1 (05%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| 2 | rau, miaZhRj | 65 | 5-3 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 30 | WRj, va-HuijD | 7 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 65 | zaijD, GuijD-raij | 4 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 63 | ChRj, zajD-vIjD | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 69 | vaj, YaRj | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 04 | vaijD, HiI-chRj | 8 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| wIUil | 49-15 (16.9%) | 0-69 (87.3%) | 66-61 (12.2%) | 63 | 46 | 30 | 89 | 63 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 60 | 655 | 664 | |||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#24 JORDAN CAROLINE
|
COMPARE PLAYERS | #1 DAN QIAO
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
