Vietnam
Regular Season Round 2: Can Tho CF - Thang Long W. 74-92
Date: July 29, 2021
Everything went according to plan when Thang Long W. defeated on the road Can Tho CF 92-74 on Thursday. Thang Long W. dominated down low during the game scoring 54 of its points in the paint compared to Can Tho CF's 30. They outrebounded Can Tho CF 54-30 including a 38-22 advantage in defensive rebounds. Thang Long W. looked well-organized offensively handing out 23 assists comparing to just 9 passes made by Can Tho CF's players. American guard Tim Guers (190-96, college: St.Anselm) notched a double-double by scoring 25 points, 18 rebounds, 9 assists and 4 steals to lead the effort and the other American import forward Bryan Coleman (198-92, college: WSU) supported him with 26 points and 13 rebounds. Even 23 points, 6 rebounds, 6 assists and 4 steals by American guard Jarvis Summers (190-93, college: Ole Miss, agency: Haylett Sports) did not help to save the game for Can Tho CF. Canadian swingman Will Tran (-98) added 18 points and 7 rebounds for the hosts. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Both coaches tested many bench players and allowed the starting five to rest. Thang Long W. will meet at home Danang D. in the next round and it will be for sure the game of the week. Can Tho CF will play again against Thang Long W. and hope to win that game.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 2: Can Tho CF - Thang Long W. 74-92
Date: July 29, 2021
Everything went according to plan when Thang Long W. defeated on the road Can Tho CF 92-74 on Thursday. Thang Long W. dominated down low during the game scoring 54 of its points in the paint compared to Can Tho CF's 30. They outrebounded Can Tho CF 54-30 including a 38-22 advantage in defensive rebounds. Thang Long W. looked well-organized offensively handing out 23 assists comparing to just 9 passes made by Can Tho CF's players. American guard Tim Guers (190-96, college: St.Anselm) notched a double-double by scoring 25 points, 18 rebounds, 9 assists and 4 steals to lead the effort and the other American import forward Bryan Coleman (198-92, college: WSU) supported him with 26 points and 13 rebounds. Even 23 points, 6 rebounds, 6 assists and 4 steals by American guard Jarvis Summers (190-93, college: Ole Miss, agency: Haylett Sports) did not help to save the game for Can Tho CF. Canadian swingman Will Tran (-98) added 18 points and 7 rebounds for the hosts. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Both coaches tested many bench players and allowed the starting five to rest. Thang Long W. will meet at home Danang D. in the next round and it will be for sure the game of the week. Can Tho CF will play again against Thang Long W. and hope to win that game.
 CAN THO CF74 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 48 | AuBBRQs, ziQLas | 42 | 3-2 (05%) | 3-9 (09.6%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 84 | 83 | 5 |
| 68 | AiB, ziQRd | 42 | 0-63 (40.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 0 | 5 |
| 10 | vR HaRu, whijh | 43 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-6 (655%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 65 | 66 | 5 |
| 0 | wQij, Wall | 48 | 8-65 (85%) | 3-65 (35%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 62 | 9 | 5 |
| 88 | XDuFRj HIijD, wu | 88 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-3 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | -8 | 5 |
| 4 | wQij gajh, HuF | 63 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 0 | -6 | 5 |
| 47 | mua ruIZ, wij | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 60 | XDuFRj kij, kajh | 1 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| 40 | giu wQujD, KaRj | 1 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 46 | wQij ka, XDhaRp | 0 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 7 | HIijD guZ, HuF | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 65 | wijD bajh, wQa | 8 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 60-35 (49.0%) | 65-87 (43.0%) | 63-86 (11.9%) | 2 | 88 | 45 | 7 | 61 | 5 | 66 | 4 | 6 | 60 | 93 | 33 | |||
 THANG LONG W.92 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 44 | CIlRBij, mQFij | 47 | 9-68 (02.4%) | 4-2 (49.0%) | 4-4 (655%) | 3 | 7 | 64 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 81 | 89 | 5 |
| 0 | GuRQs, waB | 47 | 7-61 (01.4%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 61 | 62 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 80 | 44 | 5 |
| 9 | gijD whia, HujD | 46 | 1-7 (11.9%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 69 | 69 | 5 |
| 63 | XDuFRj kij, HujD | 83 | 3-3 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-1 (05%) | 3 | 1 | 65 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 66 | 64 | 5 |
| 86 | HIijD whR, HaRj | 83 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-3 (80%) | 3-0 (25%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| 5 | HIjD Gai, vij | 85 | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| 67 | XDuFRj vR, ruIZ | 60 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 2 | gIij XhiU, ruijD | 0 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 80 | XDuFRj kaRU, Sjh | 3 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 69 | OhiB guZ, Khia | 8 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| 62 | OhiB whijh, XiB | 8 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 81 | HIijD guZ, whijD | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 89-37 (00.6%) | 2-83 (44.4%) | 63-86 (11.9%) | 61 | 42 | 03 | 84 | 67 | 5 | 65 | 6 | 4 | 85 | 78 | 74 | |||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#32 JARVIS SUMMERS
|
COMPARE PLAYERS | #5 TIM GUERS
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
