Taiwan
Regular Season Round 21: Jutai Techn. - Pauian 74-78
Date: April 25, 2021
We cannot really consider it an upset in the game between close teams when 4th placed Jutai Techn. (13-26) was defeated by fifth ranked Pauian (14-26) 78-74 on Sunday. Pauian had a 36-24 advantage in offensive rebounds. Center Dan Qiao (200-92) stepped up with a double-double by scoring 23 points and 17 rebounds for the winners and guard Jun-Xiang Lu (188-97) chipped in 16 points, 8 rebounds and 5 assists. Four Pauian players scored in double figures. The best for the losing side was American swingman Jordan Caroline (201-96, college: Nevada) with a double-double by scoring 43 points (!!!) and 12 rebounds and center Hong-Xing Wu (203-88) produced a double-double by scoring 12 points and 11 rebounds. The victory was the sixth consecutive win for Pauian. They moved-up to fourth place. Jutai Techn. at the other side dropped to the bottom position with 26 games lost.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 21: Jutai Techn. - Pauian 74-78
Date: April 25, 2021
We cannot really consider it an upset in the game between close teams when 4th placed Jutai Techn. (13-26) was defeated by fifth ranked Pauian (14-26) 78-74 on Sunday. Pauian had a 36-24 advantage in offensive rebounds. Center Dan Qiao (200-92) stepped up with a double-double by scoring 23 points and 17 rebounds for the winners and guard Jun-Xiang Lu (188-97) chipped in 16 points, 8 rebounds and 5 assists. Four Pauian players scored in double figures. The best for the losing side was American swingman Jordan Caroline (201-96, college: Nevada) with a double-double by scoring 43 points (!!!) and 12 rebounds and center Hong-Xing Wu (203-88) produced a double-double by scoring 12 points and 11 rebounds. The victory was the sixth consecutive win for Pauian. They moved-up to fourth place. Jutai Techn. at the other side dropped to the bottom position with 26 games lost.
 JUTAI TECHN.74 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 83 | CiQIlajR, zIQdij | 35 | 2-61 (05%) | 0-2 (18.0%) | 68-63 (20.9%) | 1 | 1 | 68 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 34 | 38 | 5 |
| 68 | vaj, eRj-HIjD | 43 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 61 | Wu, HIjD-NajD | 46 | 0-64 (42.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 3 | 9 | 66 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 60 | 5 |
| 40 | Yu, Chuj-Sj | 46 | 6-9 (63.4%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| 9 | Yu, Huij-Yi | 80 | 8-3 (05%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 5 |
| 3 | va, Hij-HhRjD | 62 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| 36 | Au, Ya-Chaj | 60 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | -0 | 5 |
| 09 | Wu, NaiI-zaj | 66 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 84 | vaj, mia-HiI | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 2 | ChRj, WRj-HuijD | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 62 | Wu, Ya-maj | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | ChRj, Huiaij | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 62-05 (41.5%) | 9-85 (40.5%) | 69-84 (94.7%) | 66 | 83 | 40 | 66 | 63 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 65 | 93 | 09 | |||
 PAUIAN78 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 6 | raiI, gij | 42 | 9-65 (95%) | 8-3 (05%) | 4-4 (655%) | 8 | 60 | 69 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 84 | 48 | 5 |
| 17 | Chuj-HsaijD vu | 48 | 1-66 (03.0%) | 6-2 (68.0%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 61 | 61 | 5 |
| 9 | Ahah, YRj-wsujD | 46 | 4-0 (15%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 68 | 5 |
| 4 | Wu, Chai-Chuj | 87 | 5-4 (5%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 5 |
| 7 | vaj, zaj-mijD | 81 | 4-1 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 65 | 66 | 5 |
| 68 | va, zai-KijD | 81 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 8 | 5 |
| 30 | WRj, va-HuijD | 68 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 65 | zaijD, GuijD-raij | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 86 | gu, Yu-ChRjD | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 04 | vaijD, HiI-chRj | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 69 | vaj, YaRj | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 2 | rau, miaZhRj | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 84-34 (04.0%) | 2-82 (82.1%) | 2-2 (655.5%) | 7 | 41 | 30 | 60 | 62 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 60 | 92 | 90 | |||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#24 JORDAN CAROLINE
|
COMPARE PLAYERS | #1 DAN QIAO
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
