Kazakhstan
Regular Season Round 27: Almat.Legion - Aktobe 49-85
Date: April 6, 2021
Bottom-ranked Aktobe managed to get the third consecutive victory on Tuesday night. This time newly promoted Aktobe outleveled fifth-ranked Almat.Legion in Alma-Ata 85-49. It's especially surprising that the victory came too easily and 36-point difference proves that Aktobe was well-prepared to that game. They made 20-of-25 free shots (80.0 percent) during the game. Aktobe forced 20 Almat.Legion turnovers and outrebounded them 48-37 including 42 on the defensive glass. It was an exceptional evening for American forward Kent Hanson (198-97, college: Carleton) who led the winners with a double-double by scoring 26 points and 14 rebounds. Russian Vladislav Gusak (202-95) accounted for 14 points and 6 rebounds for the winning side. Point guard Daniil Severgin (178-5) came up with 6 points, 8 rebounds and 4 assists and forward Nikita Timofeev (199-98) added 8 points and 9 rebounds respectively for Almat.Legion in the defeat. Since the result was very predictable, it gave the chance for the coaches to test many bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. The victory was the third consecutive win for Aktobe. Newly promoted Aktobe maintains sixth place with 6-21 record. Almat.Legion lost their fourteenth game in a row. Almat.Legion at the other side, also newcomer in the league, keeps the fifth position with 20 games lost. Aktobe will have a break next round, and it should allow them to practice more before next game. Almat.Legion will play again against Aktobe (#6) and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
wIUil
88-49 (07.0%)
9-45 (84.4%)
85-80 (25.5%)
1
38
32
85
62
84
63
3
8
69
20
5
Regular Season Round 27: Almat.Legion - Aktobe 49-85
Date: April 6, 2021
Bottom-ranked Aktobe managed to get the third consecutive victory on Tuesday night. This time newly promoted Aktobe outleveled fifth-ranked Almat.Legion in Alma-Ata 85-49. It's especially surprising that the victory came too easily and 36-point difference proves that Aktobe was well-prepared to that game. They made 20-of-25 free shots (80.0 percent) during the game. Aktobe forced 20 Almat.Legion turnovers and outrebounded them 48-37 including 42 on the defensive glass. It was an exceptional evening for American forward Kent Hanson (198-97, college: Carleton) who led the winners with a double-double by scoring 26 points and 14 rebounds. Russian Vladislav Gusak (202-95) accounted for 14 points and 6 rebounds for the winning side. Point guard Daniil Severgin (178-5) came up with 6 points, 8 rebounds and 4 assists and forward Nikita Timofeev (199-98) added 8 points and 9 rebounds respectively for Almat.Legion in the defeat. Since the result was very predictable, it gave the chance for the coaches to test many bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. The victory was the third consecutive win for Aktobe. Newly promoted Aktobe maintains sixth place with 6-21 record. Almat.Legion lost their fourteenth game in a row. Almat.Legion at the other side, also newcomer in the league, keeps the fifth position with 20 games lost. Aktobe will have a break next round, and it should allow them to practice more before next game. Almat.Legion will play again against Aktobe (#6) and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
 AKTOBE (coach: Arsen Teleuov)85 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 2 | wIVUiQIL, SadiQVhij | 43 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 60 | 5 |
| 2 | wIVUiQIL, SadiQVhij | 43 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 60 | 5 |
| 48 | HijsIj, KRjU | 48 | 0-7 (00.1%) | 3-0 (25%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8 | 68 | 63 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 81 | 38 | 5 |
| 48 | HijsIj, KRjU | 48 | 0-7 (00.1%) | 3-0 (25%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8 | 68 | 63 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 81 | 38 | 5 |
| 83 | OipshaL, SlRxijdRQ | 45 | 8-3 (05%) | 6-9 (63.4%) | 9-2 (29.0%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 63 | 2 | 5 |
| 83 | OipshaL, SlRxijdRQ | 45 | 8-3 (05%) | 6-9 (63.4%) | 9-2 (29.0%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 63 | 2 | 5 |
| 68 | GusiV, klidasliL | 80 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 63 | 88 | 5 |
| 68 | GusiV, klidasliL | 80 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 63 | 88 | 5 |
| 85 | ORUQashajRUs, kissalaF | 88 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-3 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 |
| 85 | ORUQashajRUs, kissalaF | 88 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-3 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 |
| 40 | eILILIF, AUijasliL | 67 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 40 | eILILIF, AUijasliL | 67 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | mIQBiURjVIL, ARQDRa | 61 | 4-4 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 66 | 5 |
| 7 | mIQBiURjVIL, ARQDRa | 61 | 4-4 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 66 | 5 |
| 60 | SJaJIL, qBaQ | 7 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| 60 | SJaJIL, qBaQ | 7 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| 69 | qLdIVaBIL, SlRxijdRQ | 7 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -6 | 5 |
| 69 | qLdIVaBIL, SlRxijdRQ | 7 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -6 | 5 |
| 9 | vishZh, mIDdij | 2 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 9 | vishZh, mIDdij | 2 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 6 | biVhijilaj, miVFU | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | biVhijilaj, miVFU | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 88-49 (07.0%) | 9-45 (84.4%) | 85-80 (25.5%) | 1 | 38 | 32 | 85 | 62 | 84 | 63 | 3 | 8 | 69 | 20 | 882 | |||
 ALMAT.LEGION (coach: Oleg Ten)49 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 46 | waBIfRRL, XaVaUi | 82 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-3 (5%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 65 | 5 |
| 46 | waBIfRRL, XaVaUi | 82 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-3 (5%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 65 | 5 |
| 33 | wiapIL, Sdal | 82 | 5-0 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | -1 | 5 |
| 33 | wiapIL, Sdal | 82 | 5-0 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | -1 | 5 |
| 3 | gJhujusIL, wRBaQlij | 81 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 6-2 (68.0%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | -4 | 5 |
| 3 | gJhujusIL, wRBaQlij | 81 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 6-2 (68.0%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | -4 | 5 |
| 2 | KIQJhIL, kidaB | 81 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-4 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | KIQJhIL, kidaB | 81 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-4 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 36 | SlMQijU, gijaRl | 80 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| 36 | SlMQijU, gijaRl | 80 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| 81 | ARLRQDaj, gijaal | 86 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-3 (5%) | 1-1 (655%) | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 66 | 5 |
| 81 | ARLRQDaj, gijaal | 86 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-3 (5%) | 1-1 (655%) | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 66 | 5 |
| 68 | eiVILsVah, bixaB | 85 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 68 | eiVILsVah, bixaB | 85 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 80 | kIlVIL, SjdQRF | 62 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| 80 | kIlVIL, SjdQRF | 62 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| 77 | eiaBIL, KiaQiU | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 77 | eiaBIL, KiaQiU | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 83 | KilFBMRUIL, gais | 0 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 83 | KilFBMRUIL, gais | 0 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 65 | eihBRdRU, eiFBMRV | 8 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 65 | eihBRdRU, eiFBMRV | 8 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| wIUil | 63-49 (49.2%) | 4-87 (65.4%) | 68-67 (14.8%) | 0 | 48 | 49 | 7 | 84 | 62 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 85 | 37 | 41 | |||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#32 KENT HANSON
|
COMPARE PLAYERS | #26 DANIIL SEVERGIN
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
